Asian Journal- The Filipino-American Community Newspaper

Sunday
Nov 22nd
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
This site is best viewed with Firefox 3, Safari 3 and Internet Explorer 7
Home Immigration Atty. Michael Gurfinkel

Atty. Michael Gurfinkel

Immigrants: Don’t treat your Green Card like a Visitor’s Visa

DEAR Atty. Gurfinkel:

I got my green card several years ago, but I still like my life in the Philippines. So, I spend most of my time in the Philippines, and go to the US only for a month or two each year. The last time I went to the States, the Immigration Officer at the airport asked me how long I was outside the US, and started making a big deal about the fact that I’m away all the time. He even wrote something in my passport about warning me.

I have a home and business in the Philippines, my kids are in school, and I’m just not ready to settle down in the States. I thought that as long as I don’t stay outside the US for over one year, that I won’t have any problems in holding on to my green card. Why is the Immigration giving me such a hard time?

Very truly yours,

GC

Read more...
 

US Citizens must file separate petitions for each ‘Immediate Relative’

Dear Atty. Gurfinkel:

While I was still an immigrant, I filed a petition for my spouse and minor children in the F-2A category (spouse and/or minor children of green card holder).  My understanding is that all of my family members were covered by that single petition.

I later took the oath of citizenship, and am being told that my petition for my family now covers only my spouse and not my children.   So, I need to file new, separate petitions for each of my kids.   Since all my family members were previously covered under my F-2A petition, why do I need to now file separate petitions for my kids?

Very truly yours,

L.D.

 

Read more...

BIA refuses to allow aged-out children to retain their parent’s Priority Date

(3 votes, average: 3.67 out of 5)

In 2006, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) issued an unpublished decision, Matter of Garcia, in which the BIA stated that if a child aged out (turned 21) while waiting for the priority date on his parent’s petition to become current, then, in certain circumstances, the parent’s petition would automatically convert to the appropriate category, and the child would be able to retain his or her parent’s original priority date.

In the Garcia case, the child was a derivative beneficiary of her parent’s F-4 petition (sister/brother).  Because it took so many years for that F-4 petition to become current, the child eventually aged out, and was no longer included under the parent’s petition.  However, the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA), enacted in 2002, contained a provision that if the age of a child is calculated to be over 21 years of age, "The alien’s petition shall automatically be converted to the appropriate category and the alien shall retain the original priority date issued upon receipt of the original petition."  In other words, the F-4 petition would automatically convert into an F-2B petition (single adult child of immigrant parent), and the child would be able to retain their parent’s original F-4 priority date.  Thus, in the Garcia case, a "32-year old child" was able to obtain a green card, without having to wait several additional years for the priority date in the F-2B category to become current, because she used her parent’s old F-4 priority date.

Read more...

The July 2009 priority dates

(1 vote, average: 1.00 out of 5)

Petitions by Citizens:

The priority date for the First Preference Category, F-1 (unmarried sons and daughters of US citizens, over 21 years of age) remained the same at September 1, 1993.

The Third Preference Category, F-3 (married sons and daughters of United States citizens) priority date remained the same at July 1, 1991.

The Fourth Preference, F-4 (brothers and sisters of United States citizens) priority date moved forward by 7 days from August 1, 1986 to August 8, 1986.

Read more...

Jury duty for illegal aliens?

Dear Atty. Gurfinkel:

I just received a jury summon from the County Courthouse, but I am in illegal status (TNT). How did they get my name and address? Do I have to serve on a jury? Will Immigration be able to track me down? Will I be reported to Immigration? How can I get out of serving on a jury? Should I just ignore or throw away the jury summons?

I am really worried about this, and have not been able to sleep since I received the jury summons in the mail.

Very truly yours,

A.S.

Read more...

Why it’s a good idea to have an attorney for your interview or hearing

Part 2

IN a previous article, I discussed some of the reasons why it is a good idea to hire an attorney for your case, especially for your interview or hearing, rather than trying to save money and do it on your own. After all, you have waited so long to achieve your "American dream", so I’m sure that you don’t want anything to happen just as you are about to "cross the finish line". At the interview, you may be tired, frightened, nervous, or your mind may go blank for even the most simple of questions, resulting in your saying or doing the wrong thing. That could result in your case being further investigated or possibly being denied, even if you are legitimately eligible for your visa.

While having an attorney representing you does not "guarantee" that your case will be approved, I think that it could greatly increase your chances, for the following reasons:

Read more...

Why it’s a good idea to have an attorney for your interview or hearing

(Part 1)

MANY people had relative petitions filed for them by family members (such as spouse, parent, brother, sister, etc.). After waiting anxiously for several years (sometimes over a decade), the priority date finally becomes current, and they are called by USCIS for their adjustment of status interview. They may think to themselves that because they filed the Petition on their own, they can handle the interview themselves and save money, by not having an attorney with them for their adjustment of status interview.

However, filing a petition and getting it approved is relatively simple, compared to an in-person interview. After all, with a petition, you fill out the form, include supporting documentation, and mail it away to the USCIS. You then receive an Approval Notice from the USCIS in the mail, without ever seeing any Immigration Officer in person.

Read more...

A relative or a friend’s legal advice could be wrong

MANY people rely on the advice of friends or relatives for their immigration problems, rather than consulting an attorney. After all, it’s cheaper. But many times, a friend’s "advice" is wrong, can mess up a person’s immigration situation, and can put a person in an even worse position than if they had done nothing at all. When people in this situation come to me for consultation, I ask "What law school did your friend or relative go to, that you’re following his legal advice?"

Here are some examples of wrong advice by friends that many people followed, only to find themselves in a worse situation:

Read more...

The June 2009 priority dates

Petitions by citizens

THE priority date for the First Preference Category, F-1 (unmarried sons and daughters of US citizens, over 21 years of age) moved forward by 1 month from August 1, 1993, to September 1, 1993.

The Third Preference Category, F-3 (married sons and daughters of United States citizens) priority date moved forward by 9 days from June 22, 1991 to July 1, 1991.

Read more...
Page 3 of 7

FASO-PASKO

Click Here 

Balikbayan Magazine Issue 9 Vol. 1 November

AJTV